Light on Stone Greek and Roman Sculpture in the Metropolitan Museum of Art
Art Review
Classical Treasures, Bathed in a New Low-cal
The other twenty-four hours, apropos of the Metropolitan Museum's fine, new light-done galleries for Greek and Roman fine art, a friend due east-mailed to me a passage past Virgil. In it Aeneas, fleeing the Trojan War, arrives in Carthage and finds a temple for Juno under construction. He pushes open the temple'south big bronze doors ("which made the hinges groan," Virgil reports) and "for the start time he dared to promise for life." He's astounded by the skill of the craftsmen and by the nobility and precision of a painting of the war. He starts to cry.
"It was only a picture, merely, sighing deeply, he let his thoughts feed on it, and his face was wet with a stream of tears," Virgil writes.
The power of aboriginal fine art has to do with its ability, as my friend put it, "to embody great acts and communicate their human dimension." Rome became the model for Western civilization from the Renaissance through the Enlightenment.
I'grand not certain exactly when its pre-eminence began to fade, just in 1949 a young, populist Met manager named Francis Henry Taylor decided to plough the Roman courtroom, the literal and symbolic climax of the building'due south southern wing, into a restaurant, which devolved into a cafeteria. Plenty of New Yorkers grew upward learning from this organization that eating a nutted cheese sandwich at Chock total o'Nuts before going to the museum was a thriftier option than buying a tuna sandwich once you got at that place.
Information technology was a life lesson, just not the kind that Virgil wrote about.
Fortunately, now, abreast the humongous column from the Temple of Artemis at Sardis, which marked the entrance to the deli, where mobs used to crane their necks looking not similar Aeneas for hope and inspiration only for the beef stew, you lot can instead gaze up at huge architectural fragments from the same temple, including one with the sort of egg-and-dart molding that inspired the Met'southward facade by Richard Morris Hunt.
Image
Like endless public institutions in America, the Met aped Rome because Rome stood for borough order, empire and reason. Greek and Roman art weren't the only historic arts of upshot, a lesson the museum taught long earlier it became stylish to disparage classical culture. Merely Rome was a standard against which to measure other cultures, including our ain.
Western artists always had, from Michelangelo, who aspired to equal the Belvedere body, to Picasso, whose "Woman in White" at the Met is unimaginable without classical fine art. Going from the Greek and Roman galleries to the Picasso is something you can just do there. Willem de Kooning and Arshile Gorky used to haunt these galleries during the 1930s and '40s and loved the Pompeiian frescoes, whose influence you tin can see in their works, not far away.
Those frescoes, from luxurious aboriginal villas on the Bay of Naples, have been cleaned and moved from the museum lobby, where tourists used to mistake them for the coat-check concession. They are reinstalled side by side to the Roman court, where they look magnificent. I hadn't noticed until lately all the phalluses on the rooftops of the fantasy buildings, painted in cinnabar and blue, which decorate the murals from a chamber cached by Vesuvius. The opulence of these scenes suggests something of what inspired Aeneas.
The courtroom, with its barmy fountain, is the centerpiece of the new galleries, which officially open today, and it's a terrific souvenir to New York, a vast, skylighted, airy new public space, chilly with all the newly scrubbed marble and naked calorie-free but aptly lofty.
Video
More Video »
It would be incorrect to say that everything on view is wonderful. There are garden-diversity sculptures from Roman baths and archaeological fragments more meaningful to specialists than to the rest of u.s.a., along with majestic portrait busts, funerary reliefs and the Badminton sarcophagus, whose reputation belies the fact that it's a bit over the meridian. The Met'due south Greek and Roman collection is enormous but not like the collections in Athens, Rome, Naples, London, Paris or Berlin, built effectually stupendous masterworks.
Video
You can say, though, that it tells the whole story. With the Greek galleries, finished eight years agone, Western artifact from the Bronze Age through the reign of Constantine now unfolds in logical, stately gild, as was intended from the museum'south early on days. Thousands of objects have been exhumed from storage (it's about time) and blithe by new touch-screen computers (useful upward to a betoken) and past air and sun.
In full there are 57,000 square feet of exhibition space for classical antiquity, around 30,000 for Rome alone, equivalent to all the galleries at the Whitney Museum combined. You can exit Rome into African fine art then go directly into modern art, which depended on both Rome and Africa for utterly dissimilar ideas about the human trunk.
That itinerary, richly detailed and arrived at over the years as the Met evolved, argues strongly for the universal museum — the encyclopedic collection, modeled after Diderot — a concept lately assaulted by lawyers, archaeologists and advocates of nationalism.
I'one thousand with the philosopher Kwame Anthony Appiah on this score. Looted art, proved as stolen, must be repatriated. But only in a narrow legal sense does patrimony necessarily belong to modernistic states occupying lands where ancient cultures once were. The Taliban demonstrated how dubious that claim may be when they blew upwards the Bamiyan Buddhas in Afghanistan.
Respect for other cultures can come not just from returning an object to where it came from merely also from "belongings onto information technology because you value it yourself," Mr. Appiah has written. My epistolary friend sent me a second electronic mail message. In 1430, he pointed out, the Italian humanist and book hunter Poggio Bracciolini acquired some Greek sculptures by the keen Polyclitus and Praxiteles. A head of Bacchus, Bracciolini told a beau classical devotee, "ought to feel g, for if he deserves lodging anywhere information technology is certainly in my land, where he is especially worshiped." Bracciolini even enlisted Donatello to check out his Greek collection.
The indicate is that objects accept one meaning to those who fabricated them, others to those who find or buy them centuries later, and yet other meanings for those who come up upon them in a museum. Their different careers ensure immortality. Rising nationalism is an alarming trend as far as this goes. Archeologists who now argue that antiquities are meliorate served in the clay where they came from than dispersed among public museums like the Met imply that they adopt the past remain dead and buried. The last thing Italy needs today is some other Roman vase.
Philippe de Montebello, the Met director, has often described his museum as a "cultural family tree in which every visitor can observe his roots." True enough, yet the implicit imperialism. The legacy of Rome is shared by countless people who become to the museum, and not but past mod-day Italians.
Fulfilling a plan initiated by his predecessor, Thomas Hoving, Mr. de Montebello has washed the Met and the city — and everybody — incalculable good by pushing through this project, which in so many ways goes against the grain. It's not nigh celebrity architecture. It'southward not politically right. The timing is atrocious, since so much attending is focused on looting. But information technology is about reiterating an ideal for fine art and for the museum, virtually extolling the collection, which is the public's heritage, seen by millions, and almost doing the hard thing because it is right.
Did I fail to mention the art? Well, virtue earlier pleasure, since Rome has been the subject. Here are a couple of works in the new galleries you lot might overlook, then you can take it from in that location. The Etruscan collection on the mezzanine, one of the best in the earth, with the famous chariot lately restored, is splendid, merely tucked away in the dorsum is a tiny phenomenon of antiquarian carving, a chunk of glowing bister, that is easy to miss. Information technology's in the shape of a man and woman entwined. He reclines abreast her, holding her in his arms. She's reclining too, wearing a pointy lid and holding a small vase in 1 hand, gently touching its mouth with her other hand, as if about to pour something perhaps. Maybe it's a dear potion. Shades of Tristan and Isolde.
And in what'south called the Hellenistic Treasury, there'south a figurine of a dancer wearing a mask. It'southward a small bronze sculpture, not nine inches tall, the Isadora Duncan of aboriginal Alexandria. Draped in layers, she twists similar a corkscrew, her body — the bend of her dorsum, her buttocks and muscled thighs — outlined by the taut cloth. The thinnest veil hides her face, and her head tilts discreetly behind 1 shoulder, a slippered foot emerging, suggestively, from beneath her robes.
She's all virtuosity and grace. Yous can detect in sculptures past Matisse and Richard Serra the influence of her torqued, complicated eloquence, transformed and transmuted through intermediaries like Borromini and Canova.
If you want to know why Greek and Roman art matters eternally, she's your answer.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/20/arts/design/20anci.html
0 Response to "Light on Stone Greek and Roman Sculpture in the Metropolitan Museum of Art"
Post a Comment